Archive

Uncategorized

Captura de Tela 2013-03-16 às 00.08.07

Never Tiring of Repeating Himself

By HILARIE M. SHEETS

Published: JAnuary 2, 2013

IN “The Visitors,” a nine-screen video installation by Ragnar Kjartansson that will have its first American showing next month, the artist lies in a pedestal bathtub almost in a trance, strumming a guitar as he repeatedly sings a refrain, “Once again, I fall into my feminine ways.” Over the course of an hour his voice falls and rises, on its own and in unison with performers on the other eight screens — each seen as if in a painting, playing an instrument in a different room of a beautiful, run-down mansion and singing the same enigmatic refrain at a dirgelike pace.

Last August the nine performers gathered in a room of the mansion, two hours north of New York City in the Hudson Valley, to rehearse. “The Visitors” would be shot later that week in a single take, with nine cameras distributed around the house, but that day they simulated being in separate rooms by avoiding eye contact.

To one onlooker what was most striking was the extraordinary emotional range and intensity of their performances. Limited to just a few simple lyrics, which they repeated dozens of times, the singers created an entirely absorbing ensemble piece that was alternately tragic and joyful, meditative and clamorous, and that swelled in feeling from melancholic fugue to redemptive gospel choir.

It was not the first such work for Mr. Kjartansson (his name is pronounced RAG-ner kuh-YART-un-sun), an Icelandic artist who, at 36, has spent more than a decade exploring the potential of repetitive performance to yield unexpected meanings, and who has lately become one of the most celebrated performance artists anywhere. In 2009 he was the youngest artist ever to represent Iceland at the Venice Biennale, and two years later his piece “Bliss” won the Malcolm Award for the most innovative work at Performa, the three-week performance art biennial in New York. His traveling museum survey, “Song,” is at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston through April 7, and his second solo show at the Luhring Augustine gallery in Chelsea, featuring “The Visitors,” will open Feb. 1.

His wide appeal, many admirers say, lies in an ability not just to invoke the deep existential concerns of much endurance-based performance art — anxiety, ennui, other discomfort — but also to push beyond them, toward joy.

“He’s someone who understands theater, who understands drama, who understands pleasure and wants the viewer to have a great pleasure,” RoseLee Goldberg, the director of Performa, said in a telephone interview. “Most of us think of performance based on the 1970s — difficult, politically engaged.” But a work like “Bliss” — in which Mr. Kjartansson and a group of Icelandic opera singers repeated the final aria in Mozart’s “Marriage of Figaro” for 12 hours with full costumes, set and orchestra — represents “endurance at a level of sheer ecstasy,” she said.

Mr. Kjartansson’s understanding of theater runs deep: his mother, Guorun Asmundsdottir, is a well-known actress in Iceland and used to perform with his father, Kjartan Ragnarsson, now a director and playwright. He spent his childhood in the wings of theaters, watching actors rehearse the same scene over and over, and remains fascinated by the way the same words can be constantly made new.

“It’s so interesting when a man enters the room and says, ‘I don’t love you anymore,’ ” Mr. Kjartansson said, then giving voice to a second actor — “ ‘Why?’ ” — and then to a director: “Let’s do that one more time: ‘I don’t love you anymore.’ ‘Why?’ ”

Watching this process, he said: “You start imagining the story, but there’s no story. I was always disappointed when there was really a play.”

Which helps explain why he was drawn to performance art. “My works are all kind of anti-storytelling,” he said. “They’re always about a feeling, but there’s no story.”

Mr. Kjartansson made his first video performance piece, “Me and My Mother,” in 2000, while studying painting at the Iceland Academy of the Arts in Reykjavik. In it he and his mother stand side by side as she spits into his face, ferociously and with complete commitment, over several minutes. He accepts the abuse, occasionally starting to giggle. Mr. Kjartansson restaged the piece five years later, and then repeated it again in 2010 after deciding to continue the cycle every five years.

The series, in which he shifts from boy to man, undermines the idea of the doting mother while also showing Ms. Asmundsdottir’s love in acquiescing to her son’s unconventional vision. And it is a gift from a son to an aging mother who no longer gets offered parts regularly.

“You get this idea of the progression of them in their relationship and also of Ragnar as an artist,” said Anna Stothart, the curator who organized “Song” for the Institute of Contemporary Art and installed the three versions on flat screens there as part of “Song.” “There are these silly moments but also these really serious moments we have in our relationships with our families.”

Mr. Kjartansson’s first encounter with the Hudson Valley mansion of “The Visitors” came in 2007, when he was introduced to its owners by a friend. The setting of the 43-room, nearly 200-year-old house, Rokeby Farm, inspired a two-day piece, “Blossoming Trees Performance,” in which he assumed the role of plein-air painter in the mode of the Impressionists or Hudson River School artists. With a grand flair obvious in photographs documenting the work, he painted landscapes in a field overlooking the Hudson. The photographs were shown alongside his finished landscapes at the nearby CCS Bard Galleries that year.

Many artists, he said, “are really performing the artist.” Despite his painting degree, he added: “I consider myself a hobby painter. It’s such a bold, egomaniac act to be, like, ‘I’m doing this and it matters!’ ”

In defense of his arch approach, he said, “I look at irony as something real, as the most human way to express yourself — not making a mockery, but using playfulness.”

Mr. Kjartansson played the artist again in Venice in 2009, just after Iceland had fallen into financial ruin. In a 14th-century palazzo he locked himself into a continuous pas de deux between artist and model, making one painting of the same friend in a Speedo every day for the six months of the biennale, as cigarette butts and beer bottles piled up. In the face of his country’s crisis, the performance, called “The End,” spoke at once to his belief in the beauty of the artistic gesture and to the futility of it.

Mr. Kjartansson is dedicated to what he calls the “divine boredom” of such marathon performances. “I hope it will offer some kind of a religious moment in a humanistic way,” he said.

Key to achieving that moment has been his attention to beauty. A live, three-week performance in 2011, at the Carnegie Museum of Art in Pittsburgh when “Song” opened there, featured the artist’s three fair, young nieces continuously singing a fragment of Allen Ginsberg’s poem “Song” as misremembered by Mr. Kjartansson. A six-hour video of one day’s performance runs in a loop at the show in Boston.

“It’s sort of a siren call,” Ms. Stothart said of that work. “It’s shot really beautifully, and you get caught in the lyrics.”

In staging the last aria from “The Marriage of Figaro” for Performa he gave the audience much to take in visually — from the sumptuous costumes to a feast of suckling pig to sustain the performers in the 11th hour. While some singers showed strain over the 12 hours, Mr. Kjartansson never flagged as he sang of repentance and forgiveness at a delirious pitch.

“The word ‘endurance’ is a little bit too athletic for me,” he said. “It’s so much harder to be a waiter than to sing opera for 12 hours. Chris Burden and Marina Abramovic gave performance this Houdini status. I don’t feel that. It’s easier than real life.”

A version of this article appeared in print on January 6, 2013, on page AR19 of the New York edition with the headline: Never Tiring Of Repeating Himself.

no site do NYT

ragnar_kjartansson3 ragnar_kjartansson ragnar_kjartansson2

Luhring Augustine is pleased to present its second solo exhibition by Icelandic artist Ragnar Kjartansson. This show marks the New York debut of Kjartansson’s most recent project, The Visitors, a nine-channel video installation based on a musical performance staged in upstate New York at Rokeby Farm. For this new work, the artist assembled a group of his closest friends, some of the most renowned musicians from Reykjavik and beyond. A depiction of individual creative minds at work and a baring of extreme collective emotion, The Visitors continues Kjartansson’s use of durational performance to explore the persona of the performer.

Kjartansson first came to know Rokeby Farm while visiting the Hudson Valley area in 2007 and has become a frequent visitor. A site remarkable for its long and eclectic history and its state of romantic disrepair, Rokeby Farm serves as a painterly backdrop to the film’s eloquent homage to friendship. The home has stood for almost two hundred years and is run by family members who have become the artist´s friends and also perform in The Visitors. They have made it their goal to preserve the traces of the past and welcome bohemia and spirituality in all its forms.

The title of the piece is derived from the 1981 album The Visitors by Swedish pop band ABBA; the album was to be the group’s final record as divorce and internal strain ended their collaboration. With lyrics from a poem by artist Ásdís Sif Gunnarsdóttir, Ragnar´s ex-wife, and musical arrangement by the artist and Davíð Þór Jónsson, Kjartansson has staged a single-take production in which his fellow musicians perform the piece for a total of 64 minutes. Each of the nine projections in The Visitors features a participant inhabiting a separate setting in the home or on the grounds of Rokeby Farm, and when viewed together the individual scenes create a layered portrait which the artist aptly describes as a “feminine nihilistic gospel song.”

Ragnar Kjartansson was born in 1976 and lives and works in Reykjavik, Iceland. The Visitorsrecently debuted at the Migros Museum für Gegenwartskunst. Other recent solo exhibitions of his work have been held at the Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo in Turin, Frankfurter Kunstverein, and the BAWAG Contemporary in Vienna. Song, his first American solo museum show, was organized by the Carnegie Museum of Art in 2011, and has since traveled to the Museum of Contemporary Art in North Miami and is currently on view at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston. Kjartansson was the recipient of Performa’s 2011 Malcolm McLaren Award for his performance of Bliss, a twelve-hour live loop of the final aria of Mozart’s The Marriage of Figaro, and in 2009 he was the youngest artist to represent Iceland at the Venice Biennale’s International Art Exhibition.

http://www.luhringaugustine.com

tá lá no Artspace

THE SKINNY: ARMORY WEEK ART EVENTS

Armory Week Art Events

Annabel Linquist, Cipst (2013) on view at the Spring/Break Art Show

By Alex Allenchey

ONGOING
The Armory Show at Piers 92 and 94 on 12th Avenue at 55th Street
Thursday, March 7th through Sunday, March 10th, Noon to 7 p.m.
ADAA Art Show at the Park Avenue Armory, 643 Park Avenue
Wednesday, March 6th through Saturday, March 9th, Noon to 8 p.m.; Sunday, March 10th, Noon to 6 p.m.
Independent Art Fair at 548 West 22nd Street
Thursday, March 7th, 4 – 9 p.m.; Friday, March 8th through Saturday, March 9th, 11 a.m. – 8 p.m.; Sunday, March 10th, 11 a.m. – 4 p.m.
Volta NY Art Fair at 82 Mercer Street
Thursday, March 7th, 2 – 8 p.m.; Friday, March 8th through Saturday, March 9th, 11 a.m. – 8 p.m.; Sunday, March 10th; 11 a.m. – 6 p.m.
SCOPE New York at the Skylight at Moynihan Station, 312 West 33rd Street
Thursday, March 7th through Saturday, March 9th, 11 a.m. – 7 p.m.; Sunday, March 10th, 11 a.m. – 6 p.m.
Fountain Art Fair at the 69th Regiment Armory, 68 Lexington Avenue
Friday, March 8th through Saturday, March 9th, Noon to 8 p.m.; Sunday, March 10th, Noon to 5 p.m.
Moving Image at the Waterfront New York Tunnel, 269 11th Avenue
Thursday, March 7th through Saturday, March 9th, 11 a.m. – 8 p.m.; Sunday, March 10th, 11 a.m. – 4 p.m.
PooL Art Fair New York at the Flatiron Hotel, 9 West 26th Street
Friday, March 8th through Sunday, March 10th, 3 – 10 p.m.
SPRING/BREAK Art Show at the Old School, 233 Mott Street
Thursday, March 7th through Sunday, March 10th; Noon to 9 p.m.
New City Art Fair at 529 West 20th Street, 2W
Thursday, March 7th through Friday, March 8th, Noon to 6 p.m.; Saturday, March 9th, 11 a.m. – 6 p.m.; Sunday, March 10th, 11 a.m. – 5 p.m.
The (Un)Fair at 500 West 52nd Street
Wednesday, March 6th through Sunday, March 10th, 11 a.m. – 8 p.m.
— TUESDAY, MARCH 5TH —
Opening reception for Christian Wassman’s “Five Platonic Objects” at R 20th Century, 82 Franklin Street, 6–8 p.m. (Through April 20th)
By the architect who designed the layout of this year’s Independent fair, a show of new “platonic” design objects—including a pillow, a table, and a chair—based on the five unique geometric forms: the circle, the cube, the tetrahedron, the octahedron, the dodecahedron, and the icosahedron.
VIP Opening Preview for the Spring/Break Art Show at Old School, 233 Mott Street, 6–10 p.m.
Taking up residency in an four-story NoLIta schoolhouse, this curator-driven art show will feature the projects of over 20 curators, all inspired by the theme of “New Mysticism.”
Gala Benefit Preview for the ADAA Art Show at the Park Avenue Armory, 643 Park Avenue, 5:30 – 9:30 p.m.
Expect the uptown crowd to throng this vernissage (hi, grandma!), but the heady mix of new and old art will draw plenty of the hip art scene from downtown too.
Opening Reception for Ed Ruscha’s “Books & Co.” at Gagosian Gallery, 980 Madison Avenue, 6 – 8 p.m.
Following last year’s exhibition of his paintings of books in Chelsea, Ed Ruscha is showing again at Gagosian—this time at their uptown location—bringing both his books and work by more than 100 artists they’re inspired.
“Draw With Us” Sketch Night at the Society of Illustrators, 128 East 63rd Street, 6:30–9:30 p.m.
Step into the Society of Illustrators for live jazz and live models in a drawing studio—sophisticated, eh—set amidst the works of art from the organization’s collection. $15 general admission, $7 students & seniors. Cash bar.
“Music in the Air” Tour for the Harlem Biennale at the Studio Museum in Harlem, 144 West 125th Street, 6:30–8:30 p.m.
This walking tour through Harlem offers an inside look at the rich, cultural history of musicians and performers who lived in the area around the turn of the 19th century. RSVP to contact@harlembiennale.org.
— WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6TH —
VIP Opening of the Armory Show on Piers 92 & 94 at 711 12th Avenue, Noon to 7 p.m. (Through March 10th)
Everyone who’s anyone in the art world will be at the gala opening of the city’s biggest art fair, and early reports from the fair say it’ll be a hit this year.
Opening Preview Benefit for the Armory Show at MoMA, 11 West 53rd Street, 11:30 a.m. – 9 p.m., After-party: 8:30 – 11:30 p.m.
They’re not cheap, but it is still possible to score tickets to the Armory Show VIP preview’s celebratory after-party at MoMA, which will feature a live performance by the lovely and powerful Solange Knowles.
Screening and Panel with Matthew Day Jackson at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 5–6:30 p.m.
If you ever wondered why seemingly every movie these day has a zombie in it, this is the panel for you. Jackson and crew discuss the making of “In Search of…Zombies,” the artist’s filmic examination of the ubiquitous cultural fad that refuses to die.

“27 Gnosis” Performance by Michael Portnoy at the Kitchen, 512 West 19th Street, 7 p.m. and 9 p.m., $15 (Through March 11th)
Staged in the form of a game show, these performances take a number of unexpected linguistic turns, as Portnoy builds a theatrical world around the combination of language and dance. Find the week-long schedule of performances here.
“Two Towel Margarita” Performance by Travis Boyer at ISA, 348 Wythe Avenue, Brooklyn, 9 p.m. – 2 a.m.
Hipster art party in Brooklyn!
—THURSDAY, MARCH 7TH—
“On Abstraction” Panel at the Volta NY Talks Lounge at 82 Mercer Street, 4:30 – 5:30 p.m. 
Four of the young artists who are exhibition at this year’s Volta NY Fair—William Bradley, Kadar Brock, Christine Frerichs, and Regina Scully—will discuss each of their own evolving approaches to abstraction.
Bronx Art Space, “Soles of the Bronx” at Bronx Art Space, 305 East 140th Street, Bronx, 11 a.m. – 6:30 p.m.
Hosted in the city’s northernmost borough, this show would be a refreshing venue for visitors whose NYC intinerary typically just includes the Piers and Chelsea.
“Organic Abstracts” by Dianne Smith at the Bartow-Pell Mansion Museum, 895 Shore Road, Bronx, Noon to 5 p.m.
Two large, Minimalist sculptures by the Harlem-based artist will be situated on the grounds of the mansion. Viewers will also have the opportunity to discover the other sculptures on the grounds of the site, which can easily be accessed by trolley from Piers 92 and 94 of the Armory Show.
“The Psychology of Consumerism” Panel at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 1 p.m.
Moderated by Felix Salmon and featuring Warhol Museum director Eric Shiner, Liz Magic Laser, and Alvin Hall, this should prove enlightening to lovers of art-fair bling.
“To Present and Collect Performance, Ephemeral, and Interdisciplinary Art” Panel at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 3 p.m.
Tim Griffin, the director and chief curator at the Kitchen, will moderate this panel on the challenges of collecting art that lacks an inherent physicality. He will be joined by Heather Corcoran, the executive director of Rhizome; Nancy Spector, the deputy director and chief curator at the Guggenheim; and Glenn Wharton, the time-based media conservator at MoMA.
Special Viewing of Walter De Maria’s the New York Earth Room and the Broken Kilometer at Dia Art Foundation, 141 Wooster Street and 333 West Broadway, 6 – 8 p.m. 
Remind yourself that some great contemporary art truly is priceless, like this room full of dirt and other room full of a kilometer’s worth of metal rods.
— FRIDAY, MARCH 8TH —
“The Armory Show 1913: Myths and Misconceptions” Panel at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 1 p.m.
To celebrate the legendary exhibition that gave the fair its name, a debunking session led by Yale art school dean Robert Storr (and featuring renowned Duchamp scholar Francis Naumann) that should bring a smile to even the most jaded art historian’s lips.
Screening of “The Show That Shook the World: Marcel Duchamp and the 1913 Armory Show” at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 3 – 5 p.m.
Another centennial celebration, this film, which features a previously unknown illustrated talk by Duchamp, will be making its national debut, followed by a discussion with its producer, that Duchamp scholar Francis Naumann.
“Posterity Will Have a Word to Say” Panel at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 5 p.m.
What will it be? Find out at the talk, which will feature former Venice Biennale curator Daniel Birnbaum, artist Paul Chan, and Vassar art historian Molly Nesbit.
Evening Tours of “How Much Do I Owe You?” at the Clock Tower Building, 29-27 41st Avenue, Queens, 6 – 8:30 p.m.
This celebrated exhibition—which transforms the interior architecture of a former bank, vault and all—returns to life, featuring work in a variety of different media by artists from 15 different countries, each of whom examines the conflicted relationship between art, money, and each other in this new post-recession economy.
“Long Night L.E.S.” at Various Locations, 6 – 9 p.m.
This Friday night over 30 galleries in the Lower East Side are staying open late to host a variety of programming, ranging from openings to talks and performances.
— SATURDAY, MARCH 9TH —
“Cut Paste and Sew” at Gallery 138, 138 West 17th Street, 5th Floor, 9:30 – 11 a.m.
Collectors, arts administrators, and artists who focus on the domestic arts, including Duron Jackson, who was recently a part of the “Raw/Cooked” series at the Brooklyn Museum, comprise this exhibition and discussion. RSVP tocontact@gallery138.com.
“The Biennial Factor” Panel at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 12:30 p.m.
Led by redoutable Sotheby’s Institute scholar Jonathan T.D. Neil, this talk will no doubt feature some of the lessons panelist Dan Cameron learned from his ill-fated turn running the Platform New Orleans biennial.
“Commissioning Work in an Art Fair Context” Panel at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 2 p.m.
Is that New York Observer culture editor and all-arond art-fair all-star Sarah Douglas moderating this panel, featuring Swiss Institute director Gianni Jetzer, curator Sarah McCrory, and artist Fatima Al Qadiri? Yes, yes it is.
Screening of “The Armory Show Focus Group” by Liz Magic Laser at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 5 – 6:30 p.m.
This film is composed of clips culled from over 12 hours of focus group discussions that Liz Magic Laser held with “art world consumers” late last year for her project as the 2013 Armory Show’s commissioned artist.
“JART3rd” at the Williamsburg Art & Historical Center, 135 Broadway, Brooklyn, 6 – 11 p.m.
In the 6th Annual Emerging Japanese Artists’ Exhibition, works in a variety of media by 24 New York and Japan-based artists—over half of whom are from Tokyo—will be on display.
The World’s First Tumblr Art Symposium at 319 Scholes Gallery, 319 Scholes, Brooklyn, 6 p.m. – 1 a.m.
Art news and analysis website (and one-time Artspace co-host) Hyperallergic has teamed with blogging platform Tumblr to present a part-exhibition, part-discussion on the future of Tumblr as a medium for art, which will simultaneously serve as a “forum for work to be discussed, shared, uploaded, and critiqued.” Drinks, pizza, art, and music also included. Add your name to the wait list here.
Silent Art Auction and Recovery Benefit at Rabbithole Projects, 33 Washington Street, 7 – 11 p.m.
In association with United Photo Industries and the Dumbo art district, Rabbithole is presenting a large group show and silent auction to raise funds for art spaces that suffered damage caused by Hurricane Sandy. The event will also feature live music and performances, as well as hors d’oeuvres and complimentary drinks. Tickets are $10 advance and $12 at the door.
— SUNDAY, MARCH 10TH —
“The Dealer’s Perspective” Tour by Cura/genda at Allegra La Viola Gallery, 179 East Broadway, 11 a.m. – 5 p.m., $20
Beginning with an introductory breakfast, this program will offer a first-hand look at some of the major players shaping the burgeoning Lower East Side gallery scene, as well as provide a background on how art is bought, dealt, and collected. RSVP to art@opalnest.com.
Lower East Side Gallery Stroll at the LES Visitor Center, 54 Orchard Street, Noon to 6 p.m.
Pick up a free map at the visitor’s center and check out a few of the over 50 galleries that will be hosting receptions in conjunction with Armory Week.
“The Question of Regionalism” Panel at the Armory Show’s Media Loungeon Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 1 p.m.
Think global, act local? Maybe that doesn’t apply anymore. Find out in this talk featuring SculptureCenter curator Ruba Katrib.
“The ‘Alternative’ in American Culture?” Panel at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 3 p.m.

Eric Shiner, the director of the Andy Warhol Museum—and occasional Artspace interviewee—moderates this discussion about whether the increasing democratization of images and absorption of “alternative” cultures into the mainstream changes how high art should be judged against more culturally popular art world and if the existing terms we use are still relevant.
Screening of “Fade to White” and “A Step on the Sun” by Janet Biggs at the Armory Show’s Media Lounge on Pier 94, 711 12th Avenue, 5 – 6:30 p.m.
Close out the weekend’s festivities with exactly what you’ll want: some time in a quiet, dark room.

JEAN-MICHEL BASQUIAT
Untitled, 1981
Acrylic, oil stick and pencil on canvas
72 x 60 inches  (182.9 x 152.4 cm)
© The Estate of Jean-Michel Basquiat/ADAGP, Paris, ARS, New York 2013

It’s about 80% anger.

—Jean-Michel Basquiat

Gagosian Gallery is pleased to announce a major exhibition of works by Jean-Michel Basquiat.

Featuring over fifty works from public and private collections, the exhibition spans Basquiat’s brief but meteoric career, which ended with his death at the age of twenty-seven. Thirty years after Larry Gagosian first presented his work in Los Angeles, twenty years after the first posthumous survey at the Whitney Museum of American Art (1992–93), and eight years after the Brooklyn Museum of Art retrospective (2005), viewers will have a fresh opportunity to consider Basquiat’s central role in his artistic generation as a lightning rod and a bridge between cultures.

Basquiat left his family home in Brooklyn at the age of fifteen and took to the streets. A voracious autodidact, he quickly became a denizen of the explosive and decadent New York underground scene—a noise musician who loved jazz, and a street poet who scrawled his sophisticated aphorisms in Magic Marker across the walls of downtown Manhattan, copyrighting them under the name SAMO.  In 1981, he killed off this alter ego and began painting, first on salvaged materials then later on canvas, and making bricolage with materials scavenged from the urban environment. From the outset he worked compulsively. He sold his first painting in 1981, and by 1982, spurred by the Neo-Expressionist art boom, his work was in great demand. In 1985, he was featured on the cover of The New York Times Magazine in connection with an article on the newly exuberant international art market. It was unprecedented for an African-American artist, and for one so young. In that photograph, Basquiat is a vision of cool, sprawled in a chair in front of one of his bold paintings in an elegant three-piece suit and tie, with bunched dreadlocks and bare feet.

Charismatic image aside, Basquiat was a unique and prodigious artistic talent, fusing drawing and painting with history and poetry to produce an artistic language and content that was entirely his own, and which enunciated alternative histories, such asDiscography (1982), Brothers Sausage (1983), and Revised Undiscovered Genius of the Mississippi Delta (1983). Combining the tools of graffiti (Magic Marker, spray enamel) with those of fine art (oil and acrylic paint, collage, and oil stick), his best paintings maintain a powerful tension between opposing aesthetic forces—expression and knowledge, control and spontaneity, savagery and wit, urbanity and primitivism—while providing acerbic commentary on the harsher realities of race, culture, and society.  In vividly colored canvases, forceful, schematic figures and menacing, masklike faces are inscribed against fields jostling with images, signs, symbols, and words used like brushstrokes. The frenetic, allover quality of many of the large works suggests a drive towards a sort of disjunctive mapping rather than the building of a classically unified composition, where seemingly unrelated marks suddenly coalesce in syncopated rhythms—like the best experimental jazz.

Basquiat’s iconography reflects the precocious breadth of his inspirations and preoccupations—from classical poetry to human anatomy, from sport to music, from politics to philosophy, from the arts of Africa to Picasso, de Kooning, and Rauschenberg. Obnoxious Liberals (1982) and Baby Boom (1982) suggest an angry bohemian’s pet peeves with contemporary mores. There are pictographic crowns, favored by graffiti artists to confer status, and warriors, whose significance is literal—as in the tributes to African American boxing champions Cassius Clay (1982), Jersey Joe (1983) Untitled (Sugar Ray Robinson) (1982)—or metaphorical—as in Warrior (1982) and (Untitled) Julius Caesar on Gold (1981). Cars, cops, street games, and skyscrapers reflect the hustle of the city in With Strings Two (1982), Untitled (L.A. Painting) (1982), andIrony of a Negro Policeman (1981), while Self-Portrait (1984) andThe Thinker (1986) are more evidently self-referential and introspective. The skull, a traditional motif of the vanitas, appeared very early in Basquiat’s oeuvre and remained a constant obsession amidst a thick and fast flow of subjects. Consider this when comparing the whimsical Bicycle Man (1984) and Riding with Death (1988), painted just four years later:  the man on a bicycle in the earlier painting has been transformed into a naked figure astride a skeletal horse in the later one—a somber, elegiac image with which Basquiat the supernova, buckling under the alienating effects of fame and addiction, ended his career and his life.

Jean-Michel Basquiat was born in New York City in 1960, where he died in 1988. Major exhibitions include “Jean-Michel Basquiat: Paintings 1981–1984,” Fruitmarket Gallery, Edinburgh (1984; traveled to Institute of Contemporary Arts, London; and Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam, through 1985); Kestnergesellschaft, Hannover (1987, 1989); Whitney Museum of American Art, New York (1993; traveled to Menil Collection, Houston; Des Moines Art Center, Iowa; and Montgomery Museum of Fine Art, Alabama, through 1994); “Basquiat,” Brooklyn Museum of Art, New York (2005; traveled to Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles; and Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, through 2006); and Fondation Beyeler, Basel, Switzerland (2010; traveled to Musée d’art moderne de la ville de Paris). Basquiat starred in “Downtown 81,” a verité movie that was written by Glenn O’Brien, shot by Edo Bertoglio, and produced by Maripol in 1981, but not released until 2000.

For further information please contact the gallery atnewyork@gagosian.com or at +1.212.741.1111.

 IMG_1837 IMG_1838 IMG_1866

February 22 – April 6, 2013

For this fifth solo exhibition at Anton Kern Gallery, Polish artist Wilhelm Sasnal has selected a group of paintings and works on paper around the theme of Kodak, the now defunct film and camera manufacturer. Some works make direct references to specific products, advertisements and to Kodak’s founder George Eastman, others create a “capture the moment” atmosphere addressing issues of picture-taking and picture-making.

It comes as no surprise that a painter and filmmaker like Wilhelm Sasnal would
make Kodak the subject of his work. Since their invention, film and cameras
have fascinated and challenged painters. Specifically, as Kodachrome film gained a reputation for its reproduction of “true colors”, the idea of reality, naturalism and truth in painting has been reformulated by artists in various ways. In addition, the Kodak pocket camera’s ability to capture a fleeting moment, along with the branding of the so called “Kodak moment” has liberated everyday photographers and created a universal culture of vernacular images that has the potential to turn ordinary events into private historical moments.

Sasnal’s position in regards to all of this is one of analytic observation and intuitive transformation. Known for his wide range of painterly methods, evident in these new paintings, Sasnal’s work deals with the underlying and subconscious presence of the history of an image, place or situation. As much as the artist is indebted to the physicality of film stock and cinematography, including its many visual effects, Sasnal creates every image as a singular event, both in his chosen motif and in the pictorial mode in which it is painted. Despite their subject’s universal nature, these works are delicate and precise, yet also singularly striking reflections on the nature of personal and collective memory. Sasnal’s paintings capture the fleeting moment twofold, once as a moment brought to a halt, quite like a photograph, and secondly as an unraveling of sub-conscious layers of meaning and history, quite beyond the capability of photography.

Sasnal’s work has most recently been featured in solo exhibitions at the Haus der Kunst, Munich (2012), Whitechapel Gallery, London (2011), K21, Düsseldorf (2009), and will be presented this fall in a major retrospective at the MSN Museum of Modern Art in Warsaw. His work has been included in group shows such as Image Counter Image, Haus der Kunst, Munich (2012), Painting Between The Lines, CAA, San Francisco (2011), The Reach of Realism, MOCA Museum of Contemporary Art, Miami (2009), the 55th Carnegie International, the Glasgow International (both 2008), Musée d’ Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris, MoMA, New York (both 2007), the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam, where he won the 2006 Vincent Van Gogh Biennial Award for Contemporary Art, the National Museum of Art in Osaka, the Museu Serralves in Porto (all 2006), and the Biennale de Sao Paulo (2004).

The exhibition will open on Friday, February 22 and run through Saturday, April 6, 2013. The gallery is open Tuesday through Saturday, 10 am – 6 pm. For further information and images, please contact the gallery at (t) 212.367.9663, (f) 212.367.8135 or email: nahna@antonkerngallery.com.

 

miroslaw_balka2

miroslaw_balka

2 x (350 x 300 x 300), 36 x 36 x 29 / The Order of Things, 2013 Steel, water pumps, plastic, rubber, water, food coloring and wood
Two parts: 137 7/8 x 118 1/8 x 118 1/8 inches (350 x 300 x 300 cm) each
One part: 11 1/2 x 14 1/4 x 14 1/4 inches (29 x 36 x 36 cm)

 

“The Order of Things”
530 West 21st Street
February 22 – March 30, 2013
Opening February 21, 6 – 8 pm

Gladstone Gallery is pleased to announce a new large-scale installation by Miroslaw Balka. Employing non-traditional art materials, Balka will create a monumental work that draws on historical tragedy to reflect on the limits of the world, continuity, and catastrophe. Balka will transform the 21st Street gallery space, constructing a private room in which to encounter his work and creating an intimate atmosphere for viewers to contemplate the massive, elegiac sculpture before them. Meditating on trauma, the discourse of nature, and the resulting wounds of historical events, the work encourages viewers to confront the past and to bear witness to the events that have come to define our present.

Over the course of the past thirty years, Balka has created a diverse body of work that engages notions of historical memory, the limits of representation, and the power and veracity of language. Encompassing installation, sculpture and video, Balka’s oeuvre has a bare and minimalist quality, exhibiting a particular sensitivity to materials that generate multilayered associations for the viewer as witness. Balka utilizes symbolic abstraction rather than discrete monument to address places and events sometimes related to the legacy of Nazi occupation in Poland and to investigate notions of trauma and collective memory.

For “The Order of Things,” Balka will contemplate both the possibility for and the limits of language and structural representation as a means for understanding history and its aftermath. Looking at the way conventions of truth and cultural discourse shift over time, Balka will contemplate the limitations of our usual modes of classification and depiction, moving beyond them to introduce the viewer to new modes of thought.

Miroslaw Balka was born in 1958 in Warsaw and was raised in Otwock, Poland, where he kept his studio until recently. Balka now lives and works in Warsaw. He has been the subject of many solo exhibitions at international venues, including Akademie der Künste, Berlin; Douglas Hyde Gallery, Dublin; Center for Contemporary Art, Warsaw; Museo Reina Sofía, Madrid; the Irish Museum of Modern Art, Dublin; K21, Dusseldorf, Germany; National Museum of Art, Osaka; Museet for Samtidskunst, Oslo; IVAM, Centre Del Carme, Valencia; Van Abbemuseum, Eindhoven; Museum Haus Lange, Krefeld; and The Renaissance Society at the University of Chicago. Balka has also been included in a number of important group exhibitions, including: “The Carnegie International 1995,” Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Documenta IX, Kassel, Germany; The 44th, 50th and 51th Venice Biennale, Venice, Italy; The 9th and 15th Sydney Biennale, Sydney, Australia; and the 2006 SITE Santa Fe, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Balka was awarded the 2009—2010 Unilever Tate Turbine Hall commission at Tate Modern, and in 2011 was included in the exhibition “Ostalgia” at the New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York.

For further information please contact contact Abby Margulies
+1 212 206 9300 or amargulies@gladstonegallery.com

ICCo produz exposições no MAC USP

O Museu de Arte Contemporânea da USP dá continuidade à abertura de sua nova sede no parque Ibirapuera com a inauguração de duas exposições no sábado 9 de março das 11h às 14h: “Sala de Espera”, instalação de Carlito Carvalhosa, e “Obra”, com fotografias de Mauro Restiffe. Carlito usa postes de madeira que um dia serviram à rede elétrica para dialogar com as colunas da arquitetura de Oscar Niemeyer. Restiffe mostra uma seleção das mais de 1500 fotos feitas durante a reforma do edifício. As exposições ficam em cartaz até 8 de setembro.

A produção das duas exposições foi feita pelo ICCo, dentro do acordo de cooperação firmado com o MAC e a AAMAC (Associação dos Amigos do MAC).

 

Imagem inline 1

“OBRA”, fotografia de Mauro Restiffe

 

Imagem inline 2

“SALA DE ESPERA”, instalação de Carlito Carvalhosa

 

Imagem inline 3

 

ICCo e SP-Arte dão bolsas de Residência Artística

Em 4 de abril, na SP-Arte, serão anunciados os dois vencedores das bolsas ICCo/SP-Arte de Residência Artística 2013. Os artistas devem viajar no segundo semestre para um período de trabalho junto às instituições Residency Unlimited, em Nova York, e Esthia, em Roma. Esta ação dá início ao Programa de Residências Artísticas do ICCo, que será ampliado no segundo semestre.

 

ICCo no Instagram e no Facebook

Acompanhe as atividades do ICCo pelo Instagram (siga ICCoartbr no www.instagram.com) e pelo Facebook (www.facebook.com/icco.art.br).

 

Imagem inline 4

contato@icco.art.br
Rua Professor Fonseca Rodrigues, 1300
05461-010   São Paulo   SP   BRASIL
+ 55 11 3811 9264   + 55 11 2389 8543
www.icco.art.br

20th_St1

Coinciding with the gallery’s 20-year anniversary, David Zwirner is pleased to inaugurate a new five-storied exhibition and project space at 537 West 20th Street with a presentation of works by Dan Flavin and Donald Judd.

As two of the most significant American artists of the post-war period, Dan Flavin and Donald Judd’s practices have come to define what has been referred to as Minimalist art. The exhibition will present two significant installations by each artist demonstrating their visually complex understanding of space and material through the use of light and form, from Flavin’s straightforward yet dramatic use of fluorescent lamps to Judd’s highly polished aluminum constructions. The installations in this exhibition are in dialogue with each other and share a distinctive and coherent understanding of the object, the space, and the viewer.

From the early 1960s until his death in 1996, Flavin produced a singularly consistent and prodigious body of work that utilized commercially available fluorescent lamps to create installations of light and color that employed systematic compositions. This exhibition will include a series of nine works by the artist collectively referred to as “the European Couples” made between 1966-1971, all of which have the same near-square cornered configuration. Each work is composed of an 8-foot square that is one of the nine colors (excluding ultraviolet, which was not available in 8-foot lengths) of fluorescent lamps that Flavin used in his system of lights:  yellow, pink, red, blue, green, warm white, cool white, daylight, and soft white. While they each stand alone as individual works, these constructions demonstrate Flavin’s interest in serial and permutational configurations. Presented together the series produces an immersive, site-situational environment of light and color, which gives a unique perspective to the architectural components of the new gallery space. The nine works are dedicated to European friends and colleagues who were influences in the artist’s life.

Judd began his practice as a painter in the late 1940s, although he soon introduced three-dimensional elements into the surface of his work. His first sculptural objects took the form of shallow reliefs, and by 1963 he had begun to create freestanding works that were presented directly on the floor and the wall. Throughout his practice, Judd used materials such as plywood, steel, concrete, Plexiglas, and aluminum and employed commercial fabricators in order to get the surfaces and angles he desired. He created declaratively simple, fundamental sculptural forms, many of which took the shape of simple “boxes” or “stacks,” which he would often arrange according to repeated or sequential progressions.

With the intention of creating work that could assume a direct material and physical presence without recourse to grand philosophical statements, Judd eschewed the classical ideals of representational sculpture to create a rigorous visual vocabulary that sought clear and definite objects as its primary mode of articulation.

The exhibition will include an untitled five-unit sculpture from 1991 that demonstrates Judd’s visionary approach to using industrial material as well as his considered attitude toward form, proportion, and installation. This work is unique within Judd’s overall practice in that it is the only incident in which the artist combined circular columns within the square format of the aluminum box. Each identically scaled freestanding box is arranged in a single row spanning across the gallery floor. Large in scale, this work relates to Judd’s interest in what curator Barbara Haskell has called his “architecturally sensitive formulation of space.”1 The interior space of each box, which is open on each side, consists of vertical cylindrical forms in different spatial configurations, yielding a dialectical tension that reflects light in different ways. Each unit is positioned exactly 30 cm (1/5 of the width of each unit) from the other allowing the surrounding natural light in the space to bring out the subtle qualities of the material and form. Moreover, it invites an ambulatory viewer, as it cannot be comprehended in its entirety from a singular point-of-view.

This exhibition will provide a rare opportunity to experience two large-scale presentations by Flavin and Judd that demonstrate both artists’ unique ability to unify form and material while incorporating—through their deliberate installation and use of light and color—the surrounding architecture into the perception of the works themselves.

Flavin_Judd_FI-400x266

About the artists:

Dan Flavin’s (1933-1996) work has been widely exhibited since the early 1960s and is currently on view in Dan Flavin: Lights at The Museum Moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig (MUMOK), Vienna (through February 3, 2013) and Dan Flavin: Drawing at the Kunsthalle Bielefeld (through March 3, 2013). The Estate of Dan Flavin is exclusively represented by David Zwirner. The gallery presented Dan Flavin: the 1964 green gallery exhibition in 2008 (at Zwirner & Wirth) and Dan Flavin: Series and Progressions in 2009 (at its Chelsea location).

The work of Donald Judd (1928-1994) is included in numerous museum collections. Permanent installations of the artist’s work can be found at Judd Foundation spaces in New York City, at 101 Spring Street (the newly restored building will open to the public in June 2013), and Marfa, Texas, along with the neighboring Chinati Foundation. The Judd ranch house Casa Morales is available for viewing by special appointment. Judd Foundation (Rainer Judd and Flavin Judd, Co-Presidents) is exclusively represented by David Zwirner. In 2011, the gallery exhibited a selection of works by the artist drawn from his seminal 1989 exhibition held at the Kunsthalle Baden-Baden, Germany.

JUDDO0367-Untitled-1991_view-3-600x396 Installation-view-Dan-Flavin-and-Donald-Judd-David-Zwirner-New-York-2013_1-600x241

187

SAVE THE DATE:

Lecture with Haim Steinbach

Tuesday, March 12, 2013
6:30 PM in the Lecture Hall
The Institute of Fine Arts, New York University
followed by a reception

Haim Steinbach rose to prominence in the 1980s by creating sculpture in which the latent cultural value and socially critical characteristics of commodity objects were brought to the fore. He developed a strategy of arranging objects on laminated wood shelves. His investment in collecting, organizing and displaying objects of a particular time often reveal the darker, ironic, humorous and psychological aspect of the culture in which they were produced. His “shelf arrangements” have profoundly shifted the implications of and possibilities for the readymade object in art, and ignited a deeply contested post-modern artistic debate.

Steinbach received his BFA from Pratt and his MFA from Yale in 1973. Solo exhibitions have been held at the Center for Contemporary Art, Rotterdam (1992), Museum Moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig, Vienna (1997), and the Berkeley Art Museum, UC Berkeley (2005).

Taking advantage of the IFA’s location in one of the world’s leading art centers, the Graduate Student Association invites artists to discuss their work at the Institute. Begun in 1983, these talks are now funded by a generous gift in memory of late IFA Professor Kirk Varnedoe, who inspired the series.

The lectures are free and open to the public, but an RSVP is required. To make a reservation for this event, please click here. Please note that seating in the Lecture Hall is on a first-come first-served basis with RSVP.

Organized by Student Coordinators: Anne Wheeler and Jeffrey Uslip

 

lá no site da NewYork.

matisse

Henri Matisse’s Nude in a Wood (1906).

Happy birthday, modern America! For all practical purposes, you were born 100 years ago this month. After February 17, 1913—the opening of what’s now simply called the Armory Show—you have never been the same. Thank God!

Originally called the International Exhibition of Modern Art, the show included around 1,200 works of art by more than 300 artists. Two thirds of the pieces on view were by Americans. Staged on the drill floor of the new 69th Regiment Armory on Lexington Avenue and East 25th Street, the show afforded America its first in-depth look at the art of Picasso, Braque, Duchamp, and many others. (Today’s Armory Show, the art fair held annually on the West Side piers, is unrelated.) By the time the show closed on March 15, 70,500 people had poured through. The last day’s attendance was said to be 10,000. When it went to Chicago after that, the attendance was estimated at 188,000.

How significant was the show? Salon impresario Mabel Dodge wrote to Gertrude Stein that it was “the most important public event … since the signing of the Declaration of Independence” and predicted it would cause “a riot and a revolution and things will never be the same afterwards.” One New York critic wrote that “American artists did not so much visit the exhibition as live at it.” Albert C. Barnes, Henry Frick, and the Met bought some of the work. The founding of MoMA, the Whitney, and much else stems directly from those 27 Earth-shaking days. And you can revisit them right now in Montclair, New Jersey: Thanks to the acumen of curators Laurette McCarthy and Gail Stavitsky and the foresight of one little institution that could, the Montclair Art Museum has mounted a small, smart, brassy show. Here, a tiny tip of the iceberg is on view: 40 works that were actually in the show by 38 artists, mostly Americans. Why no major New York art museum tried to do this is baffling.

Why did the original set off such an atom bomb of anger? The New York Times headlined one story “Cubism and Futurism Are Making Insanity Pay.” (There were no Futurists on hand. They were invited, but their consigliere, Filippo Marinetti, wouldn’t mingle with Cubists.) The press lambasted artists as “paranoiacs,” “degenerates,” and “dangerous.” The show was like “visiting a lunatic asylum,” filled with the “chatter of anarchistic monkeys.” The art was “epileptic.” Conservative American painter ­William Merritt Chase clucked that Matisse was a charlatan. Indeed, Matisse came in for ­especially harsh criticism. (More, even, than Duchamp’s sensation-causing Nude ­Descending a Staircase, No. 2.) When the show reached Chicago, art students tried Matisse in absentia for “artistic murder, pictorial arson … criminal misuse of line,” and burned copies of his paintings. They tried to burn him in effigy, too, but were thwarted by local authorities. Critics opined that Matisse’s were “the most hideous monstrosities ever perpetrated” and “poisonous.” The former president Teddy Roosevelt barked that the art was “repellent from every standpoint,” and concluded that there’s “no reason why people should not call themselves Cubists, or Octagonists, or Parallelopipedonists, or Knights of the Isosceles Triangle … one term is as fatuous as another.”

A hundred years later, the received wisdom is different, but it’s still wrong. Most art historians today say that, in 1913, American artists were yokels, and the Armory Show marked the arrival of European sophistication on our shores. Although the Montclair curators accept that America was behind the curve, they also note that Americans knew change was afoot. By 1913, they were—apart from the academicians—keen on the European vanguard. Numerous Americans had studied, worked, or exhibited in Europe, including many women. (Almost 20 percent of the Americans in the Armory Show were female—a better ratio than we often see today.) Between 1907 and 1913, there were more than 60 exhibitions of “modern art” in New York. In 1905, ­Alfred Stieglitz had opened a tiny gallery at 291 Fifth Avenue that had almost as big an effect as the Armory Show, championing Americans like Georgia O’Keeffe, John Marin, Paul Strand, and Marsden Hartley, who is my favorite prewar American painter. Stieglitz also showed Europeans like ­Picasso, Matisse, and Brancusi.

The Montclair exhibition is a blast of fresh scholarship and a godsend of celebration. It also reveals that the original show was uneven. Much of what’s on view is competent and striving but conservative. You’ll see pictures of puppies and sunsets, rustic towns and mystic seashores. Just as the Armory Show ruthlessly exposed the difference between what “modern” meant in Europe and what it meant here, the new show does the same. In the U.S., realists like ­William Glackens, Robert Henri, and George Bellows were called “modern,” but only because of their subject matter—­vernacular street scenes, prostitutes, boxers—and Manet-like greasy paint and post-Impressionist brushwork. All but a very few American artists were trying to be “modern” without Cubism, Fauvism, and Futurism, and most of them fell into obscurity as those isms made their way across the ocean to us.

That said, there are lots of yummy exceptions. I love John Marin’s mad quasi-­Cubistic watercolor of New York’s St. Paul’s; Kathleen McEnery’s nudes standing in the super-condensed flat space of Picasso’s Blue Period; Oscar Bluemner’s flat planes depicting the Hackensack River; Edward ­Hopper’s sailboat, which isn’t modern but already shows signs of the implacable isolation that would later make his paintings quake; and Maurice Prendergast’s street scene, probably the most fully realized modern picture here. But mainly you’ll see why the Armory Show changed everything—why American art altered its essential course. The lessons of the Armory are the ones all moments of change provide.

I’ve lived through a couple of artistic shifts and have gleaned some intelligence about which artists get left behind. They’re often the ones who don’t press extra-hard on their work. I’m not talking about changing one’s core or following fads for their own sake. I mean questioning what’s contemporary about what one is saying. In the early eighties, I watched excellent artists of the seventies fade away as they couldn’t ­accommodate the ideas of irony, feminism, and neo-conceptualism that were taking the stage. They refused to, or couldn’t, ­engage with the culture, and that culture passed them by.

Legions of American artists were lost, too, after the Armory Show. But many adjusted to the shock, discovered a strong fresh footing, and found a new faith in the powers of art. The Montclair show is a cautionary tale to artists everywhere to be alert to moments like this—to have the wherewithal to perceive metapatterns reforming, tendencies in motion, and your own insides being twisted inside out.

The New Spirit: American Art in the Armory Show, 1913; Montclair Art Museum, Montclair, New Jersey; Through June 16.

*This article originally appeared in the March 4, 2013 issue of New York Magazine.

 

newmuseum

lá no site do new museum.

“NYC 1993: Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star” looks at art made and exhibited in New York over the course of one year.

Centering on 1993, the exhibition is conceived as a time capsule, an experiment in collective memory that attempts to capture a specific moment at the intersection of art, pop culture, and politics. The social and economic landscape of the early ’90s was a cultural turning point both nationally and globally. Conflict in Europe, attempts at peace in the Middle East, the AIDS crisis, national debates on health care, gun control, and gay rights, and caustic partisan politics were both the background and source material for a number of younger artists who first came to prominence in 1993. This exhibition brings together a range of iconic and lesser-known artworks that serve as both artifacts from a pivotal moment in the New York art world and as key markers in the cultural history of the city.

“NYC 1993: Experimental Jet Set, Trash and No Star” draws its subtitle from the eponymous album that the New York rock band Sonic Youth recorded in 1993 and captures the complex exchange between mainstream and underground culture across disciplines, which came to define the art of the era. The exhibition takes a broad view of the New York scene as it existed twenty years ago—focusing not only on a single generation of emerging New York artists, but also looking at more senior figures and individuals from other cities who had some of their first significant exhibitions in New York in 1993. Works that are immediately recognizable from major institutional presentations like the Whitney Biennial and Venice Biennale are presented alongside lesser-known works, which may have initially only been seen by a small audience in commercial galleries, alternative spaces, or in the artist’s studio.

This exhibition is not a definitive history of the art in the 1990s, nor is it one that privileges a single group of artists united under a single thematic or conceptual banner. Instead, the exhibition takes the form of a kind of vertical cross section of artistic production in New York City—capturing both the familiar and the forgotten, and bringing together individuals who may have originally inhabited radically different positions. The critical debates and discussions of the early 1990s—on issues such as racial and gender politics, globalism, and institutional critique—have been taken up again in recent years by younger artists, writers, activists, and filmmakers, demonstrating how our current social and political moment grows out of the events and ideas of the recent past. Many of the artists in the exhibition have only recently become prominent, and although others may seem less familiar to a contemporary audience, all the participants have contributed to the complex intersection between art and the world at large that defined the 1990s and continues to shape artistic expression today.

The exhibition is accompanied by a fully illustrated catalogue with key historical texts and reflections by younger curators and writers on the impact of this pivotal moment in American culture.

“NYC 1993” is curated by Massimiliano Gioni, Associate Director and Director of Exhibitions, Gary Carrion-Murayari, Curator, Jenny Moore, Associate Curator, and Margot Norton, Assistant Curator.

Captura de Tela 2013-03-01 às 22.35.32

New York, December 3, 2012 —The Art Show, the nation’s longest running fine art fair,
announces participating galleries for its 25th edition, to take place March 6 through March 10, 2013
at the historic Park Avenue Armory, with a ticketed Gala Preview on March 5. Organized by the
Art Dealers Association of America (ADAA) to benefit New York’s Henry Street Settlement, the
25th annual Art Show will once again present thoughtfully curated solo, two-person, and thematic
exhibitions by 72 of the nation’s leading art dealers and galleries.

Linda Blumberg, ADAA’s Executive Director, remarks on the qualities that distinguish The Art
Show among art fairs worldwide, “Even with the proliferation of art fairs globally, ADAA’s fair
remains unique. Whether it is a solo or two-person show, or a thematic presentation, each booth
at The Art Show is a finely curated exhibition. ADAA dealers conceive and install significant
exhibits at our fair and use it as an opportunity to advance their gallery’s vision. The Art Show
remains a fair by US dealers with international reach and an international sense of qualitywhile
also remaining a true highlight on the cultural calendar here in New York each March.”

With the celebration of ADAA’s 50th anniversary, and the upcoming 25th edition of The Art Show,
Art Show Chairman, Adam Sheffer, states, “ADAA’s Art Show broke new ground in producing a
stellar art fair in New York City 25 years ago. Today, the Art Show continues to be an ideal venue
for New Yorkers and visitors to connect with artists and dealers and purchase exquisite works.”
The 2013 Art Show leads a contingent of art fairs around New York City such as The Armory
Show, VOLTA, INDEPENDENT, and SCOPE, which also take place during the same week.

The Art Show’s considered, curated exhibitions offer a dynamic selection of artworks—juxtaposing
modern masters and cutting edge contemporary works in exhibitions from galleries all over the
country. As in recent years, the 2013Art Show will include a number of groundbreaking solo
exhibitions, such as: Louise Lawler at Metro Pictures, David Zwirner’s presentation of Milton
Avery, and Tacita Dean at Marian Goodman Gallery. The anticipated thematic group shows
include “Cubism and Pop” at Richard Feigen & Co., and “20thCentury Impressionism” at
Acquavella Galleries, Inc. ADAA also welcomes two first-time exhibiting galleries, 303 Gallery
and Yossi Milo Gallery.

International art insurance specialist, AXA ART, returns as Lead Partner of The Art Show 2013.
In addition to the Art Show, since 2008, AXA ART has collaborated with and supported the ADAA
Collectors’ Forum Series which bringstogether the most prominent collectors and art market
experts to cultivate knowledge and education in the fine arts.

The Gala Preview on March 5, 2013 and daily admissionsto The Art Show from March 6th– 10th will benefit Henry Street Settlement, one of New York City’s best-known and most effective social services agencies.

For further press information or visual materials, please contact:
Concetta Duncan, FITZ & CO
T: 212-627-1455 x232 E: concetta@fitzandco.com

The Art Show 2013

List of Exhibiting Galleries
303 Gallery
Acquavella Galleries, Inc.
Adler & Conkright Fine Art
Alexander and Bonin
Brooke Alexander, Inc.
Ameringer | McEnery | Yohe
Gallery Paule Anglim
John Berggruen Gallery
Blum & Poe
Peter Blum Gallery
Marianne Boesky Gallery
Tanya Bonakdar Gallery
Cheim & Read
James Cohan Gallery
Conner•Rosenkranz LLC
CRG Gallery
D’Amelio Gallery
Maxwell Davidson Gallery
DC Moore Gallery
Tibor de Nagy Gallery
Richard L. Feigen & Co.
Ronald Feldman Fine Arts
Fischbach Gallery
Debra Force Fine Art, Inc.
Forum Gallery
Fraenkel Gallery
Peter Freeman, Inc.
Galerie St. Etienne
James Goodman Gallery
Marian Goodman Gallery
Van Doren Waxter
Lillian Heidenberg Fine Art
Hirschl & Adler Galleries
Paul Kasmin Gallery
Sean Kelly Gallery
Anton Kern Gallery
Nicole Klagsbrun Gallery
Barbara Krakow Gallery
Lehmann Maupin
Galerie Lelong
Jeffrey H. Loria & Co., Inc.
Luhring Augustine
Lawrence Markey
Mary-Anne Martin/Fine Art
Barbara Mathes Gallery
McKee Gallery
Anthony Meier Fine Arts
Menconi & Schoelkopf Fine Arts
Metro Pictures
Laurence Miller Gallery
Yossi Milo Gallery
Mitchell-Innes & Nash
Mnuchin Gallery
Moeller Fine Art
David Nolan Gallery
P•P•O•W
Pace Gallery
Pace/MacGill Gallery
Pace Prints & Pace Primitive
Petzel Gallery
James Reinish & Associates, Inc.
Mary Ryan Gallery, Inc.
Susan Sheehan Gallery
Manny Silverman Gallery
Skarstedt Gallery, Ltd.
Sperone Westwater
Leslie Tonkonow Artworks + Projects
Van de Weghe Fine Art
Weinstein Gallery
Michael Werner
Pavel Zoubok Gallery
David Zwirner

mark_dion

Sea Life, 2013. Detail.

MARK DION: Drawings, Prints, Multiples and Sculptures
February 28 – April 13, 2013
Galleries 1 & 2

For immediate release

Tanya Bonakdar Gallery is very pleased to present a major upcoming exhibition of works on paper and new sculpture by Mark Dion.

Since the early 1990s, Dion has developed a remarkably dynamic and influential investigation of the visual representation of history, knowledge and the natural world. The artist’s practice, which includes sculpture, installation, photography, and works on paper, along with writing, teaching and institutional collaborations, explores historical practices of organizing and studying the world, and their influences on contemporary perceptions about nature. In doing so, Dion often subverts the traditional hierarchies and structures of power that frequently frame our understandings. With an edge of irony, humor and improvisation, the artist deconstructs scientific and museum-based methods of collecting, arranging and exhibiting objects by appropriating and incorporating them critically into his projects and exhibitions. From projects involving pseudo-archeological digs, to cross-country expeditions, to his own architecturally scaled wunderkammers, or cabinets of curiosities, Dion’s work continues to confront the inherent contradictions between the artifact and the context in which it is displayed for popular consumption. His spectacular collections and displays of ancient and modern objects reflect his own, fictive version of history, encouraging viewers to question contemporary institutions and popular ideologies that define today’s “official” story of nature.

Marking the artist’s sixth solo exhibition at the gallery, this show will present an extensive survey of over one hundred of Dion’s drawings, prints and multiples within both upstairs gallery spaces. Works on paper have remained a critical part of his practice, and many of these were created concurrently with Dion’s different projects and travels. Environmental concerns, the effects of industry and human negligence on the natural habitat, and our relationship to guns and hunting are just some of the issues that Dion has addressed in depth over the past twenty years, and which seem more poignant now than ever.

Dion will simultaneously transform the ground floor gallery space into a fictional natural history museum, presenting six major new sculptures that share a particular focus on the ocean and sea life. Again, environmental crises, climate-related current events, and rising ocean levels provide compelling contexts and dramatic lenses through which to contemplate this important body of work.

Trichechus manatus latirostris presents the skeleton of a manatee hovering in a glass vitrine over tar-covered trinkets. Here, Dion expands upon his concept of “The Tar Museum,” an idea that the artist has been exploring for nearly twenty years. Tar, obtained by natural decomposition of organic materials, most notably crude oil, has become a recurring motif in the artist’s work symbolizing the functional transformation of materials used in industrial products. Dion also makes reference to Joseph Beuys, who proposed that fat is a substance that binds energy and releases it into the world in order to provide energy for man and animal alike. In this work, Dion suggests that tar offers the radical opposite of this concept: altered by way of biotechnology, and despite its organic origin, tar consumes energy and releases it in combustible ways to negative and suffocating effects. Moreover, shiny trinkets refer to the trifles of material culture and the exchange of commerce in our modern world.

Many of these works also critically examine the development of our fascination with the sea as filtered through the lens of scientific discovery, history and cultural influences such as popular literature and design. In his work Encrustations, a collaboration with artist Dana Sherwood, Dion and Sherwood engage the viewer’s historical imagination as they explore the history of San Francisco’s Fort Point, a Civil War-era military fort located along the shoreline of the Pacific Ocean. While it still remains intact, the artists conduct what Dion describes as “fantastical archeology,” presenting a remarkable collection of barnacle-encrusted “artifacts” – everyday objects such as a spoon, shoe and trinket box – one might find in the fort if it had been submerged a century ago. In blurring the lines between artifact and art, natural and man-made, this work also reveals the role of imagination in constructing our own ideas about objective scientific and historical truth.

Similar politics of display are evident in Marine Invertebrates, another vitrine work that brings together models of undersea organisms and everyday household objects. As in his other collections, Dion combines these objects into his own, whimsical arrangements that resist immediate interpretation, instead inviting viewers to reconsider their own ideas of classifications and relationships, particularly between the natural and manufactured. Sea Life, a life-size replica of a vendor’s book cart, further deconstructs these popular interpretations by chronicling their presence in contemporary literature. Inspired by the wooden display boxes used by vendors on the banks of the Seine River in Paris, Dion’s cart contains a collection of sea-themed books and manuscripts, ranging from technical guides to marine biology textbooks to classic novels such as 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and Moby Dick. Familiar titles recall popular stories about the sea, suggesting but a few of the cultural influences that continue to shape contemporary understandings and discourse about nature.

Dion also maps historical influences in The Documents through a series of papier-mâché sculptures that recall American explorer Sterling Clark’s expeditions to Northern China in 1908. In this work, Dion recounts this expedition under his own, critical lens, recreating a collection of objects the explorers would have either left behind or deemed too insignificant to record in their journals. The resulting sculptures reveal the subjectivity of history, a recurring concern in Dion’s practice that also emerges in the show’s largest work, Waiting for the Extraordinary. Inspired by the academic classifications invented by Michigan Chief Justice Augustus B. Woodward in the eighteenth century, this architecturally scaled installation presents a single room with thirteen plastic sculptures, each symbolic of one of Woodward’s professorships. As viewers enter the darkened space and encounter these illuminated objects, they confront questions about the distinction between the rational and subjective in our construction of knowledge, as well as role of the museum and institutions that continue to determine it.

Born in Massachusetts in 1961, Mark Dion currently lives in New York City. Major recent exhibitions include his presentation at dOCUMENTA 13, Kassel, Germany, 2012 (group); Oceanomania: Souvenirs of Mysterious Seas, Musée Océanographique de Monaco and Nouveau Musée National de Monaco / Villa Paloma, Monaco, 2011 (solo); MARK DION: Phantoms of the Clark Expedition, The Explorers Club, New York, organized by The Clark Art Institute, Williamstown, MA, 2012 (solo); Den, a site-specific installation for the National Tourist Routes, Norway, 2012 (solo); The Marvelous Museum: A Mark Dion Project, Oakland Museum of California, Oakland, CA, 2010-11 (solo). Last month, The Museum Het Domein in Sittard, The Netherlands opened a major solo exhibition entitled The Macabre Treasury, which will be on view through May 5, 2013.

Paulo Herkenhoff programou cursos e parceria para atender 200 mil estudantes da rede municipal por ano

Escola do Olhar destina ao setor educativo área quase igual à de exposições e é aposta para atrair visitantes

tá lá na Folha/UOL

FABIO CYPRIANO ENVIADO ESPECIAL AO RIO
MARCO AURÉLIO CANÔNICO DO RIO

“Não queremos um museu que seja vitrine, não é um museu dos grandes fetiches, dos recordes de aquisição, mas onde as coisas entram porque podem produzir algum sentido. É um museu de produção de pensamento.”

Diretor do Museu de Arte do Rio quer inverter eixo cultural da cidade
Focado em formação de pessoas e de acervo, Museu de Arte do Rio abre na sexta-feira
Conheça como será o Museu de Arte do Rio, que abre nesta semana

Essa é a defesa entusiasmada de Paulo Herkenhoff, diretor cultural do Museu de Arte do Rio (MAR). Ele fala do espaço com a empolgação de alguém prestes a concretizar um sonho. “Prometi a mim mesmo que não trabalharia mais em museus, mas não resisti a esse projeto”, confessa.

Leia a íntegra da entrevista com Paulo Herkenhoff, diretor do Museu de Arte do Rio, que abre na próxima sexta-feira (28).

*

Folha – O Rio precisa de mais um museu?
Paulo Herkenhoff – O Rio precisa de um museu que está a altura da tarefa civilizatória de um museu. A primeira tarefa de um museu é colecionar. Qual museu do Rio está colecionando?

O Museu Nacional de Belas Artes?
Só porque comprou um Portinari? Mas há quanto tempo não comprava?

Mas é preciso construir um novo museu para começar a colecionar?
Uma nova instituição, já que o Belas Artes está como está. Os museus privados têm grande dificuldade de sobrevivência e os públicos estão atrelados à burocracia, ao aparelhamento.

O Ibram (Instituto Brasileiro de Museus) não teve dinheiro para comprar um desenho de Tarsila do Amaral sobre um poema de Oswald de Andrade, mas tinha dinheiro para pagar ônibus para a claque. O Ibram não representa a museologia brasileira, representa uma visão do Estado, personalizada, sobre museus. O que está sendo construído para o acervo do Belas Artes?

A minha pergunta é: arte é necessária? Quando você me pergunta se mais um museu é necessário, eu pergunto: mais uma pintura é necessária? Mais uma fotografia é necessária?

Elas são necessárias porque são da maneira que são, são significativas para a sociedade. Senão, é mais um lixo que vai ser acumulado e vai parar na feira.

Paulo Herkenhoff, diretor cultural da nova instituição de arte do Rio
Paulo Herkenhoff, diretor cultural da nova instituição de arte do Rio

Você tem metas para o aumento da coleção?
Eu sou borgeano, freudiano e warburguiano [referente ao historiador da arte alemão Aby Warburg (1866 – 1929)]. Parar de colecionar é conversar com a morte. O que é a pulsão de vida em um coleção é a coleção viva, continuando. Eu sou warburguiano pelas formas transversais. Estou muito interessado em livros de artistas.

Eu escrevi um artigo chamado “Pum e cuspe no museu” para lidar com os pequenos atos, para quem não entende o conceito de “inframince”, de Marcel Duchamp, em que ele fala dos pequenos fatos na vida que nos atordoam, que criam diferença, que nos capturam no estranhamento.

Para isso, ele cita como exemplo o roçar da calça de veludo como um som que se dispara e nos dá uma outra percepção do mundo. Se eu não souber diferenciar um “inframince” de um barulho qualquer, eu posso achar que isso é um pum.

Da mesma maneira, se eu não estudar o informe, certos pequenos gestos, eu vou pensar que o escarro, que é origem da noção de informe, é cuspe. Aí, eu não vou entender a obra do porco empalhado do Nelson Leirner. Eu vou achar que é porco, e a obra é arte, assim como posso pensar que é arte, quando é apenas porco.

E, para terminar com Borges, ele dizia que os argentinos tinham direito a Hamlet e ao cosmos.

Você diz que o MAR não é um museu de eventos, você acha que os museus no Brasil são muito preocupados com eventos?
Não sei. Posso dizer que este [o MAR] não é um museu de eventos. É o museu necessário. Há dez anos eu quis fazer um programa de educação para atender 200 mil crianças de rede municipal e me puxaram o tapete. Este projeto aqui era para o Museu de Belas Artes. A ideia de um museu para a rede pública era de 2003.

E por que não aconteceu, quando você era diretor do Museu de Belas Artes?
Porque o dinheiro foi negado. Então qual é missão de um museu no Rio? Primeiro, colecionar. Quais museus do Rio têm missão clara? Acho que o MAM (Museu de Arte Moderna) está construindo uma visão clara, tem um programa de exposições muito importante, um programa de debates, mas não está colecionando. Sem colecionismo não existe ideia de museu.

Qual era a ideia original? É verdade que se pensou em uma Pinacoteca, ou em um museu para guardar o acervo de Roberto Marinho?
Sobre isso você nunca vai ver algo escrito, apenas intriga. Quem disse isso? Intriga é fácil fazer.

Mas Pinacoteca era a ideia original…
Não vamos misturar alhos com bugalhos. Esse é um museu da cidade do Rio para a população do Rio, pensado para a rede pública municipal de ensino. Se for bom para a rede pública, será bom para os cidadãos do Rio, e se for bom para o cidadão do Rio, será bom para os turistas. Se a gente fizer um museu que discuta bem o Rio, vai ser bom para nós e para o Rio. Esse é o primeiro ponto.

Esse museu, inicialmente, foi pensando, não por mim, para abrigar, temporariamente, coleções privadas, mas sem nenhuma conexão com os organizadores do museu. Ou seja, era um museu que parecia museu mas não era. Museu sem coleção é centro cultural. Isso foi entendido. A ideia de chamar Pinacoteca não é minha, mas o nome Museu de Arte do Rio de Janeiro é meu. Pinacoteca é coleção de pinturas, então seria inadequado. Temos que ser lógicos na escolha das palavras.

Quando se incorpora o nome museu, incorpora-se tudo que é da civilização de museus: que forma coleção, que estuda sua coleção, que registra. Nós temos trabalhos já começados a serem feitos com universidades para o estudo da coleção.

Não é um museu que tem um penduricalho de gente, mas que trabalha com muita gente. De uma universidade vêm 12 professores, o que é um trabalho de troca mútua, porque não envolve dinheiro. A universidade quer pesquisar, nós desejamos pesquisadores e é a universidade que define a pauta. Nós não vamos substituir a universidade, mas ser um espaço de reflexão.

Mais: não tem “interior decoration”, não tem shopping. Tudo aqui tem sentido. Se você me perguntar sobre qualquer obra que você viu, eu vou lhe explicar porque ela está na coleção, porque ela está na exposição e porque ela está naquela posição na exposição. Eu não prego uma obra na parede sem saber que obra é essa, qual seu sentido histórico, qual é sua relação em uma exposição. Eu não faço decoração de interior e nem defendo consumo.

Estamos em um momento no Brasil que o mercado define as relações com a arte?
Quais são as notícias que mais saem nos jornais? O mercado é necessário, mas é necessário na instância própria do mercado.

Esse museu é um trabalho onde a sociedade civil participa em um eixo entre o Estado e o mercado, cada um em uma posição. Isso se chama esfera pública na teoria habermasiana. Qual é o lugar da arte na esfera pública do Rio? Quais são os museus que estão introduzindo a esfera pública, pensada como tal?

Quando eu digo que nós temos mais de 40 fundos, isso significa que nós temos mais de 40 decisões de apoiarem a constituição de um acervo para o Rio, para o sistema educacional.

Como eu disse, não é cultura do espetáculo. Não há preocupação com recorde. Eu não disse em nenhum momento o valor de uma obra. Eu não falei de raridades.

Eu digo que a incorporação mais importante no MAR é a aquisição de um Aleijadinho, o que não havia em nenhum museu da cidade. É preciso pensar o que significa uma cidade que não tem Aleijadinho e nem o está buscando, em termos da história da arte brasileira e o que ele representa no presente, como ele alimenta o presente em valores simbólicos e para a população afro-brasileira.

Há uma questão essencial no MAR que é a preocupação com o educativo, mas museus, como o MAM nos anos 1960, tiveram uma papel importante para estimular a produção artística. Existe essa preocupação aqui?
Há alguns pontos que sustentam o arco da educação no MAR, entre esses pontos há um projeto de pequenos cursos profissionalizantes para adolescentes das comunidades, sem grandes oportunidades, que é como ensinar fazer moldura, montar uma exposição, ou seja, preparar jovens que possam adquirir uma profissão. Isso já está em marcha.

Depois teremos também seminários de curadoria, coordenados pela Lisette Lagnado. Isso ainda não começou, talvez no segundo semestre, ou mesmo no ano que vem. Mas a ideia é ter seminários, que durem três ou quatro meses. Primeiro as pessoas passam uma semana no Rio, depois viajam e voltam.

Depois nós vamos ter residências de artistas. Já temos autorização para alugar uma casa no Morro da Conceição, só não está sendo trabalhado agora, porque a prioridade é o processo de institucionalização.

O Rio tem uma dificuldade para criar um sistema de massa de arte e educação. Qualquer capital importante, você pega Belém do Pará, por exemplo, eles levam dez mil crianças ao Arte Pará, com monitoria, ônibus, pessoas que ajudam. Isso em Belém do Pará, na Amazônia, um lugar distante, fora do sistema de lei Rouanet.

Você vai a Porto Alegre e há uma tradição histórica. Há 30 anos eu vou a Porto Alegre, com a Evelyn Ioschpe, e há 30 anos já se trabalha lá com arte e educação.

Na Bienal de São Paulo, eu levei 200 mil crianças, um projeto de massa. E isso é muito importante. Temos dois desafios: um é como você traz, não é fácil trazer, custa dinheiro; o outro problema é como você individualiza, lidando com a massa, quais os sistemas de poder que se estabelecem e precisam ser rompidos.

O professor de arte não é o que não sabe, é o que pode. Se você diz que uma curadoria é um saber superior, você diz que o professor, que rala com a criança, não sabe. Claro que ele sabe, inclusive dar a dimensão da incomunicabilidade.

Nesse sentido, o MAM do Rio tem um trabalho importante, o [Guilherme] Vergara, no MAC de Niterói, tem um trabalho importante, a Casa Daros vai ter um papel importantíssimo. Mas cadê os outros museu? Eles não têm recursos.

E o papel dos centros culturais, como o CCBB?
É bom, mas eles têm outra dimensão. Há os centros culturais financiados por empresas, que têm uma necessidade de performatividade importante, ligado ao sistema de marketing. O banco fez 150 anos, tem uma campanha vinculada a crianças, então faz uma exposição de novos artistas. Isso não é o que a gente quer. A gente quer independência. A gente não pretende ter a maior visitação do ano.

Nós pretendemos explorar ao máximo o resultado social do custo financeiro que tem um museu. Quanto custa para a cidade produzir um museu como esse? Esse custo tem que ser defendido a cada centavo, ele tem que produzir uma irradiação correspondente. Eu sei fazer uma exposição bonita, mas fazer uma exposição que realmente signifique algo para pessoas que nunca vieram ao museu é o nosso desafio.

Como receber uma pessoa que cruza esse espaço desconhecido, que para ela é uma barreira social, já que ela nem sabe se está vestida corretamente, ela tem medo de se comportar. Isso tudo tem que ser visto com enorme afetividade.

Mas metade da verba para o funcionamento do museu será buscado no mercado, via Lei Rouanet…
Não uso esse conceito de mercado porque eu não trabalho com produtos. Nunca trabalhei com produtos. Trabalho com livros, curadorias, textos, aulas, visitas mediadas, esse é meu processo.

O mercado é muito importante, mas dentro do MAR há um grupo de empresários que vai trabalhar isso, mas não para desenvolvimento econômico, e sim para desenvolvimento social. E nós seremos avaliados por isso, por instituições como a Fundação Roberto Marinho, que tem a Vera Guimarães, que nos anos 1960 foi assistente do Paulo Freire, e já alfabetizou cinco milhões de crianças.

Como é a estrutura do MAR?
Nós não queremos uma penca de gente aqui, nós queremos abrir espaço para as pessoas. Por isso, a exposição da coleção Fadel, eu estou fazendo junto com o [Roberto] Conduru, que é professor da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

A exposição do Rio é feita por um professor universitário e um curador da Pinacoteca de São Paulo e professor da USP. Não se trata de criar um corpo burocrático com funcionários donos de seus espacinhos. Isso é um museu onde o pensamento é vivo. A biblioteca vai começar, em julho, com 5 mil volumes. Você tem ideia de como estão as bibliotecas do Rio? O Museu Nacional de Belas Artes tem comprado livros? Comprar livros não dá resultado político!

Eu não vou mudar o mundo, mas com essa equipe a gente pode transformar essa cidade. Eu vou trazer o [filósofo francês Jacques] Rancière, o [cineasta alemão Harun] Farocki, o [historiador francês] George Didi-Huberman, mais os do Brasil, como o Daniel Lins, especialista em Deleuze, no Ceará, isso vai transformar o Rio.

O Rio ficou à margem, o que se passa de importante no Rio de Janeiro, que realmente produza transformação? Eu sempre salvo o MAM, porque acho que ele faz um trabalho sensacional, mas o MAM não esgota as necessidades do Rio.